This newsletter is about the role of higher ed in society. Each week, we highlight how college is (or is not) working for citizens and communities. It goes out most Friday mornings — If someone forwarded this to you, you can sign up for your own copy here.
The Weekly Dispatch
Sign up for the newsletter
A newsletter about role of higher education in society — plus Open Campus developments. By Sara Hebel and Scott Smallwood
The suddenly essential jobs no one wants
It’s hard to talk about Pittsburgh for very long without “eds and meds” entering the conversation. Education and medicine have been heralded for their role in reinventing the Steel City, becoming new pillars of the region’s economy in recent decades.
Enrollment in key training programs for allied-health fields is plummeting, as is job satisfaction in many of those careers. More than 90 percent of Pittsburgh’s hospital workers are thinking of leaving the profession, according to a recent survey by the University of Pittsburgh.
“People appreciate the roles that healthcare systems are playing in changing what Pittsburgh looks like,” said Ray Engel, a professor of social work at the University of Pittsburgh who has spent the past five years researching the working conditions of hospital workers. But, “We find it ironic that it was only with the pandemic that people started to see, particularly lower wage workers, as suddenly essential.”
Health and medicine is often pitched not only as a solution for powering regional economies but also for advancing individual careers. One of the biggest draws for programs in allied health has been the promise of available jobs and solid salaries. Some deliver on those promises — others fall short.
For respiratory therapists? On average, they earn $72,295 per year in Pittsburgh after an 18 month-program. That’s above Pittsburgh’s median household income of $55,500.
For people working in diagnostic, intervention, and treatment care, salaries tend to be closer to $46,000 two years after graduation. But students who pursue clinical or medical lab programs earn almost exactly the same as the average high-school graduate without a college degree: $26,000.
But even having a better return on investment, in terms of pay and employability, hasn’t protected many programs from dwindling student interest. That includes Pittsburgh Technical College’s programs that train surgical technologists, a high-demand job with an average salary of $51,575 in Pennsylvania, and the Community College of Allegheny County’s respiratory therapy program, which had only half as many students in 2020 as in 2018.
A strained workforce
Ultimately, the challenge of the labor market may be hard for some of these college programs to overcome, said Shalin Jyotishi, a senior policy analyst for New America.
“We desperately need great allied-health workers. It’s an essential job, but unfortunately right now we do not compensate our essential workers the way we should.”
And the layered problems, some of which existed pre-COVID, makes it challenging to for people to stay in these jobs, Naomi reports. All of this begs the question of what could happen to a city like Pittsburgh now so centered around health care.
“Everyone is going to need health care,” said Jeff Shook, a University of Pittsburgh professor and researcher. “If we have a workforce that is so strained and unable to do what they want to do, it is going to affect everyone in the city.”
Elsewhere on Open Campus
In Indiana, Stephanie Wang examines how well the state is delivering on the promise of its one-year certificate program that allows residents to get training to become welders, electricians, medical assistants, web programmers, or truck drivers for free. The state touts that grant recipients increase their salaries by a median $6,800 a year after training. Still, experts say the state can do more.
- And a bright spot in the program — that it attracts more Black and Latino students — could also pose a danger, Stephanie writes, of steering students of color away from four-year colleges and into lower-paid jobs.
In Pittsburgh, Carnegie Mellon has drafted a policy that would allow its police to use facial recognition technology during criminal investigations. Some say facial recognition can be useful, especially in an era in which educational settings can turn into targets, Emma Folts reports. But researchers and civil liberties advocates have argued that it threatens privacy and poses disproportionate risks to people of color and other marginalized identities.
“It really is inconsistent with concepts of academic freedom and intellectual curiosity,” the ACLU told Emma.
The enrollment roller coaster continues for many Northeast Ohio colleges, Amy Morona writes. Some leaders told Amy that things were starting to feel slightly more normal this recruiting season, although there’s still a fair amount of uncertainty. And flat enrollments are now a cause for celebration.
Abortion and higher ed
Will the U.S. Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision change college-going patterns? The short answer is no. Most students go to school in state and most stay close to home. That means weighing reproductive rights and abortion laws aren’t going to be part of most students’ calculations.
But for some — especially wealthier students who live in states where abortion remains legal — choosing to attend a school in a state where the procedure is now banned just became a lot more complicated.
Some smart looks at the issue in the last week or so:
- Nell Gluckman at The Chronicle wrote about how the ruling might change the landscape for both students and faculty.
- Jon Boeckenstedt, vice provost for enrollment at Oregon State University, examined how this might affect freshman migration.
- James Murphy at Education Reform Now built on Jon’s analysis in a blog post looking at the potential economic impact for two types of institutions: publics that recruit heavily out of state and privates in conservative states that serve mostly students from liberal places.
Topping that list are places like Oberlin College, Kenyon College, Tulane University, and Washington University in St. Louis. All of which bring more than half of their students from states with liberal abortion policies. At Oberlin, it’s 7 out of 10 students. Will those liberal students still be willing to head to school in Ohio?
And this won’t just be a private college issue. A few major public universities have made their finances work in the last generation by heavily recruiting from other states. The University of Alabama, for instance, brings three of every five freshmen from out of state — and now, even in the South, a quarter of the students come from states with more liberal abortion laws. At West Virginia University, nearly half the students hail from liberal states. A drop in these students is a real hit to the bottom line, Murphy points out, because they often pay $20,000 more a year than in-state students do.
Keep in touch
Please share. Forward this newsletter to colleagues, family, and friends who might be interested. They can sign up for their own copy here.
Support our journalism. Here’s where to donate.
Work with us. Cover higher ed on the U.S.-Mexico border with us and El Paso Matters. Apply here.
Sign up for our free newsletters. Get regular insights from our expert reporters on critical issues in higher ed. Sign up here.
Run a newsroom and want to improve your coverage of higher ed? Let’s talk.
Got a story tip or a question? Please send it along.