About

We’re working to transform local reporting on college by combining the sophistication of a national newsroom that knows a topic very deeply with the engagement of a community newsroom that knows a place very deeply.

Prison, rehabilitation, and wasted potential

Bill Keller is the former executive editor of the New York Times and founding editor of the Marshall Project. His new book, “What’s Prison For?”, came out in October. Photo courtesy of Columbia Global Reports.

A biweekly newsletter about the future of postsecondary education in prisons. Written by Open Campus national reporter Charlotte West.

College Inside
Sign up for the newsletter

A biweekly newsletter about the future of postsecondary education in prisons. By Charlotte West.

Subscription received!

Please check your email to confirm your newsletter subscription.

Short on time? Here are the highlights:

  • Read my Q&A with Bill Keller, founding editor of The Marshall Project, on his new book, “What’s Prison For?”. 
  • Federal Student Aid published a paper form for student loan forgiveness, in English and Spanish. It still requires information that incarcerated borrowers don’t have, like a phone number and email address. And, it doesn’t ask for a physical mailing address. 
  • The Education Department published the final regulations for full restoration of Pell Grants for people in prison. The Department addressed stakeholders’ concerns over some of the metrics used to evaluate prison education programs, but declined to include additional accountability and transparency measures for correctional agencies, which will be approving and evaluating programs. 
  • ICYMI: Read Rahsaan “New York” Thomas’ interview with Suave Gonzalez on the role of prison when you think you’re never getting out. 

Support our NewsMatch campaign

As a nonprofit newsroom, we rely on grants and donations to keep bringing you news about prison education and sending the print edition of this newsletter to more than 700 incarcerated readers.

Here’s what a few of them had to say:

Until Dec. 31, NewsMatch will double your new monthly donation 12x or match your one-time gift, up to $1,000. If you would like to help me continue to do this work, please donate here 

Q&A with Bill Keller on the purpose of prison

Bill Keller’s new book, “What’s Prison For?”, came out at the beginning of October. Photo courtesy of Columbia Global Reports.

For this issue of College Inside, I interviewed Bill Keller, former executive editor of the New York Times and founding editor of the Marshall Project, about his new book, “What’s Prison For?”. In the book, which came out in early October, Keller delves into the tension between punishment and rehabilitation in the U.S. prison system. Looking at rehabilitative efforts such as college-in-prison initiatives and other skill-building programs, Keller reports on innovative solutions in small pockets of the prison system that offer a glimpse of what the future could look like. 

Charlotte West: You chronicle some of the shifts in attitudes towards criminal justice reform, becoming more punitive and then shifting back to more rehabilitative. One of the most recent examples of the focus on rehabilitation is the reinstatement of Pell Grants for people in prison. I’ve talked to advocates who are worried that there’s a very narrow window to prove that it works. What’s your take on that? Do you see a shift back towards more punitive approaches?

Bill Keller: In voting to restore Pell Grants for incarcerated students, Congress prescribed more rigorous vetting and tracking of the programs eligible for Pell money…You can’t rule out the possibility that these quality-control hurdles will just become an excuse to say no. Whatever the outcome, restoration of Pell Grants is a big deal. It sends a message that education of the incarcerated is not just humane but good for public safety.

How did your own experience teaching writing in prison inform your reporting for the book?

My class at Sing Sing — which ran into the pandemic lockdown after four weeks — probably had a stronger effect on me than on the students. It left a swirl of impressions. I’ll cite two. First, as I note in my book, their first writing assignments underscored the experience of early trauma that shaped, or misshaped, their lives, and helped explain — not excuse, but explain — what brought them to prison. Second, my class consisted of “alumni,” prisoners who had already earned at least one college degree behind bars. They had accomplishments and aspirations, a sense of purpose and maturity, which reinforced my lament about prison. It wastes so much human potential. I hope to teach again in the winter.

++ Read the full interview with Bill Keller here. 

A paper form for forgiveness is here…but it doesn’t work for incarcerated borrowers.

Federal Student Aid finally published a paper form for student loan forgiveness, in English and Spanish. The website says the form is intended for people who have limited internet access. It’s unclear if that means incarcerated borrowers. I called the Education Department for clarification when I saw the form, but they declined to provide immediate comment. I’ll keep asking. 

A few barriers stood out to me with the current form: It requires information that incarcerated borrowers don’t have, like a phone number and email address. And, it does not ask for the applicant’s physical mailing address. It provides a postal address to submit the form, but does not explain how the department will communicate with borrowers to confirm that their loans have been forgiven or if they need to provide additional information. The paper form appears to ask for the exact same information as the online application that launched in October.

As I’ve reported before, people in prison are generally unable to call the 1-800 numbers for the FSA Info Center or the Student Loan Debt Resolution Center to find out information about their loans. So right now, the Education Department has published a paper form for people who have limited access to the internet that requires…access to the internet. 

Update as of Nov 3: Guidance from experts working in the higher ed in prison field is that people write onto the form a mailing address where the Education Department can send information back to them. If someone doesn’t have an email or phone, they can leave those blank. “Discussions are underway about how to modify the form to work for people who will be completing a hard copy version,” Margaret diZerega said on LinkedIn.

The final rules for Pell Grants in prison

 Shutterstock

Last week, the Education Department published the final regulations that will govern the implementation of Pell Grants for people in prison starting in July 2023. The regulations outline what colleges that want to offer prison education will need to do to use Pell Grant funds and what data they’ll have to report to the Education Department to assist in assessing programs. 

The Education Department estimates that 450,000 incarcerated students will become eligible for prison education programs with next year’s expansion. This will be the first time since 1994 that incarcerated students will have widespread access to federal financial aid. 

Margaret diZerega, director of the Unlocking Potential initiative at the nonprofit Vera Institute of Justice, said that one of the biggest goals of the Pell regulations is ensuring that prison education programs are of comparable quality to what is offered on their main campuses. 

“One of the benefits of these programs having access to Pell is that there are expectations that come along with someone using their Pell eligibility to go to college, things like academic advising, career services and library resources,” she said. “Going through this particular funding mechanism, as opposed to it being strictly through philanthropy, obligates the college…to be thinking about how do they appropriately staff these programs, how do they bring in the right level of financial aid support, etc.”

The role of correctional agencies in determining whether or not a program was operating in the best interest of students and what metrics would be used in program evaluation were some of the biggest concerns commenters raised in the lead up to the rules. Commenters stressed that correctional agencies, in their role as “oversight entities”, might lack expertise and capacity. 

Here are three ways the Education Department addressed public comment on the rules:

  • The most prominent change the Education Department made in response to public comment was making outcomes data optional rather than mandatory, including the continuation of education post-release; job placement rates; earnings; recidivism; and program completion. 
  • Commenters also called for greater transparency and accountability measures for correctional agencies, such as an appeals process for prison education programs that were not approved, but the Department declined to incorporate any into the regulations, citing a lack of authority. It did note that an appeals process would be a best practice. 
  • The Department also declined to address concerns that some correctional agencies would exclude students with certain convictions or long sentences, even though eligibility established by Congress is “sentence blind.” Some commenters had asked that the regulations should stipulate that prison education programs could not bar people based on nature or length of their sentence. 

The Department noted that it does not have the authority to regulate a college’s admissions requirements or how a correctional agency restricts enrollment in postsecondary programs.

diZerega said that broadened access to higher education in prison will hopefully alleviate some of the previous restrictions. “It was such a huge win that when Pell reinstatement passed at the end of 2020 that it was going to be applicable to all people in prison, regardless of sentence length or conviction type,” she said. “When programs are in scarce supply, corrections departments have choices to make about who gets access to the program.”

But hopefully, she said, as prison education programs become more widely available, a broader array of people will get access.

However, diZerega stressed that colleges need to think about diversity, equity, and inclusion in their prison education programs just as they do on campus. She added that colleges will need to get all parts of the institution on board if they want to design effective prison education programs. 

The Department confirmed that Pell Grants can be used for correspondence courses but said that colleges offering print-based courses will have to follow the same approval process as other programs. “We seek to hold all programs accountable to the standards outlined in these final regulations, regardless of the method of delivery,” it wrote. 

The department is creating a web page for resources and guidance about prison education programs, and opened an email address, pep@ed.gov, for people working with these programs to send questions.

Related coverage:

++ Round-up from the 2022 National Conference for Higher Education in Prison, including comments on Pell from Education Department officials.

++ Who has been participating in Second Chance Pell?

Let’s connect

Please connect if you have story ideas or just want to share your experience with prison education programs as a student or educator. You can always reach me at charlotte@opencampusmedia.org or on Twitter at @szarlotka. To reach me via snail mail, you can write to: Open Campus Media, 2460 17th Avenue #1015, Santa Cruz, CA 95062.

We know that not everyone has access to email, so if you’d like to have a print copy College Inside sent to an incarcerated friend or family member, you can sign them up here. We also publish the PDFs of our print newsletter on the Open Campus website. There is no cost to subscribe to the print edition of College Inside. 

— Charlotte West

Related Posts